CO129-143 - Sir MacDonnell - 1870 [1-2] — Page 122

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

121

on

for perjury had from the Bench made several observations reflecting Mr Pannefate's Conduct as Attorney General because he did not as a matter of duty, if not of Law, institute and conduct all prosecutions.

This point, as Your Lordship is aware, had been already referred to the Law Officers of the Crown, whose

30%

S. S.

No 157

opinion is to the effect that the Attorney General of this Colony is not called upon to conduct all Prosecutions, and that Prosecutions may be instituted by private persons represented by their Attorney and Counsel.

Mr Pannefate adds that a Copy of Your Lordship's despatch in reference to this question, which is recorded in the Court, had been shown to Mr Smale by the Registrar, and further that Mr. Smale had stated to him, Mr Pannefate, that the case in question was a very fit one for a private prosecution. Under these circumstances it is not surprising that Mr Pannefate should express himself much hurt at a repetition of these public attacks by the Chief Justice on him in relation to the discharge of his official duties, for which he is certainly not responsible to Mr. Smale and especially upon a point which had been already disposed of by Your Lordship and

Edit History

2026-05-20 12:01:01 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
121 on for perjury had from the Bench made several observations reflecting Mr Pannefate's Conduct as Attorney General because he did not as a matter of duty, if not of Law, institute and conduct all prosecutions. This point, as Your Lordship is aware, had been already referred to the Law Officers of the Crown, whose 30% S. S. No 157 opinion is to the effect that the Attorney General of this Colony is not called upon to conduct all Prosecutions, and that Prosecutions may be instituted by private persons represented by their Attorney and Counsel. Mr Pannefate adds that a Copy of Your Lordship's despatch in reference to this question, which is recorded in the Court, had been shown to Mr Smale by the Registrar, and further that Mr. Smale had stated to him, Mr Pannefate, that the case in question was a very fit one for a private prosecution. Under these circumstances it is not surprising that Mr Pannefate should express himself much hurt at a repetition of these public attacks by the Chief Justice on him in relation to the discharge of his official duties, for which he is certainly not responsible to Mr. Smale and especially upon a point which had been already disposed of by Your Lordship and
Baseline (Original)
121 on for perjung had from the Bench made several observations reflecting Mr Panneefate's Conduct as, Attamey Guneral because he did not as a matter of duty, if not of Law, institute and conduct all prosecutions. This point, as Your Lordship is aware, had been wheady referred to the Law Officers of the brown, whose 30% S. S. No 157 opinion is to effect that the Attomey tride & to General of this bolony is not called to Jupon to conduct all Prosecutions, and be instituted that Prosecutions may by private persons represented by their Attorney and bounsel. awn M2 Poumufate addo that a Capy of Your Lordship's despatch in 1869 2.6. 10698-67 reference to this question, which is recorded in the bourt, had been shown to Mr Smale by the Registion and further that Mr. Smale had stated to him Mr Paincefate, that the Case case m in question was a very fit for a private presscution. Unider these circumstances it is not surprising that No. Paunrefate should express himself much hunt at a repetition of these public attacks by the Chief quatice on him on him in relation to the discharge of his official duties, for which he is certainly not responsible to M. Smale and expecially upon point which had been aheady disposed of by Your Lordship and
2026-05-20 12:01:01 · Baseline
View content

121

on

for perjung had from the Bench made several observations reflecting Mr Panneefate's Conduct as, Attamey Guneral because he did not as a matter of duty, if not of Law, institute and conduct all prosecutions.

This point, as Your Lordship is aware, had been wheady referred to the Law Officers of the brown, whose

30%

S. S.

No 157

opinion is to effect that the Attomey tride & to General of this bolony is not called to Jupon to conduct all Prosecutions, and

be instituted

that Prosecutions may by private persons represented by their

Attorney and bounsel.

awn

M2 Poumufate addo that a Capy of Your Lordship's despatch in

1869

2.6. 10698-67

reference to this question, which is recorded in the bourt, had been shown to Mr Smale by the Registion

and

further that Mr. Smale had stated to him Mr Paincefate, that

the

Case

case m

in question

was a

very fit

for a private presscution. Unider these circumstances it is not surprising that No. Paunrefate should express himself much hunt at a repetition

of these public attacks by the Chief quatice on him

on him in relation to the discharge of his official duties, for which he is certainly not responsible to M. Smale and expecially upon point which had been aheady disposed of by Your Lordship and

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.